Like most people in the country I’m pretty depressed about where Ireland has ended up. And I don’t see an election, which replaces one set of Peter Principle County Councillors with another set, helping in any way. Politics in Ireland is completely broken and I’m finding myself in a situation where I don’t want to vote if all it does is elect more of the same.
In an ideal world i.e. not Ireland, you would see new parties forming that build on the anger of the populace and offer something radical, new, modern, urban and focused on National issues. Unfortunately in Ireland, if you want to skip the usual suspects, you can choose between:
- a bunch of right-wing religious nut-jobs or
- a bunch of old-school pinkos in suits or
- a bunch of murderers in suits
Even if you did form a new party, it would get almost no votes since it would need to spend years playing the bullshit local politics game that lies at the heart of all of our problems.
Here’s how you currently get elected to run the country:
- Be a teacher, other public sector employee, accountant, solicitor, publican or auctioneer
- Join the local branch of your favourite party
- Get involved in “local issues”.
- Build up a support base.
- Be seen as a “family man/woman” and be heavily involved in sport
- Run for the local council and get elected. In Bandon you only need 100 votes to do this.
- Bide your time
- Become an expert in street lights, water pressure, roadworks, church gate collections, removals and funerals
- Run for the county council. Get elected.
- Pick the man/woman who you are going to piggy back on e.g. Mini Martin or Batt in Cork. This is critical, pick the wrong one and there goes any chance of you making it to the big leagues when they are promoted/retire.
- Bide your time
- Finally when the opening appears through death/retirement/MEP-ship, “throw your hat in the ring”
- Get picked by the party to run (you have been networking during all these years to make sure you are the one who is picked, haven’t you? )
- Hurrah, you now have a seat in the Dáil. You can chill for a few years so you don’t rock the boat.
- Make sure your local constituency office is very active in the community. If you forget this bit, you’ll be out in the next election.
- Claim credit for everything the County Council, Public Sector or Government does in your constituency or county. Anything from a new light on the bypass to the actual bypass itself
- Make sure the locals see you regularly in your constituency office and make sure they see that you are solely responsible for sorting out whatever it is that they were already entitled to if they had just contacted the relevant department themselves.
- Run the next time and get elected
Or
- Be a son/daughter/nephew/niece of a TD
- Wait until Mammy/Daddy/Uncle/Auntie retires/dies and take their seat.
This is why our Dáil is full to the rafters of people you wouldn’t hire to work in your own business in a million years. But they are not to blame, you are. As long as you expect the people who are supposed to be running the country to sort out your mickey-mouse local problems, you are going to elect completely the wrong people to the Dáil. The idea that you contact your National Representative when you have a local problem is so utterly ridiculous it’s staggering.
How do we solve this? Well people are too lazy to change so they’ll probably have to be forced to (plastic bags anyone?). What if it was made illegal for a sitting TD to contact any government department or public sector body about a constituent’s problems? Based on the potential for corruption? Would that sort it out?
Until we fix this local nonsense out and start electing National politicians with the skills and aptitude to run a country, Ireland will remain a tin-pot banana republic with delusions of grandeur run by a cabal of small town operators.
But let’s pretend the Irish voters get a clue and start realising they are the problem and they start thinking about the future of their country rather than their townland. Imagine a party with no ties to the past starting with a blank sheet of paper. What would I like to see in their manifesto in order for me to be able to vote for them. Here’s a random unordered, incomplete list of the stuff that’s been bouncing around in my head.
- As I said above, make it illegal for a sitting TD to contact any government department or public sector body about a constituent’s problems
- Force all public sector employees to resign from their positions if they are elected TDs. Yes teachers I’m talking about you.
- Complete and utter re-structuring of the HSE from the ground up. Removal of layer upon layer of health board legacy management.
- Firing, demoting or “early retirement” for every senior civil servant in Dept of Finance (and elsewhere) involved in the destruction of the Irish economy. It shouldn’t just be the temporary government that gets the bullet, it’s time the permanent government took some responsibility for their actions.
- The titles and responsibilities of all senior Civil Servants to be regularly distributed to the public and those Civil Servants interviewed regularly by the media about their roles, recommendations and decisions.
- Cancelling of all state and semi-state contracts with the audit firms that were involved with Irish banks over the past 5 years. Those firms blocked from new contracts for another 5 years.
- All public sector pay and promotions based on strict performance metrics.
- A 4-week review of every quango in Ireland with the aim to shut down 60% of them in 6 months. Any quango whose only job is to formulate policy, replicate what another quango does or spend training grants to be the first to go.
- A rapid-fire review of what FÁS does and whether it provides any lasting value to the people being trained or to the country
- A 4-page summary of every contract to the big consulting firms to be delivered by the relevant departments. These would list the intent, projected deadline, projected cost, current actual timeline and current actual cost. Aim to shut down 60% of them in 6 months with no new contracts to the big firms.
- Creation of position of Government CIO/CTO (possibly the only decent idea Brian Cowen ever had. Where is that person Brian?) Every public sector IT project over a certain value to be vetted and monitored by small team of full-time IT experts working for that person, not the big consulting firms.
- Upskilling of people at every level in the public sector so that IT initiatives become driven by needs from the bottom-up
- Mandating of online communications tools wherever possible to reduce public sector travel, both for cost and environmental reasons. This includes things like IM, Yammer, Wikis, desktop sharing, webcam-based video conferencing etc etc
- A guarantee to deliver, before the following election, a list system to bring real expertise into the Dáil.
- Either shut down the Seanad or make it directly electable. We can no longer afford a dumping ground for has-beens or never-weres who like the sound of their own voices.
- TDs, Ministers and Taoiseach’s salaries to be brought down to acceptable levels.
- Banning of all Government appointments to state and semi-state boards.
- Splitting of RTE into three independent businesses:
- Commercial business spun off as a private entity funded only by advertising.
- Semi-State Public Service Broadcaster funded by a much reduced licence fee. The IMF bailout coverage fiasco was a new low point for RTE public service broadcasting. This needs to be fixed.
- State body managing the network and providing it on commercial basis to all comers, including the previous two (see next point)
- Creation of a National Infrastructure Management Agency (NIMA). I was a fan of the privatization of Eircom back in the day but as I sit here on rubbish ADSL in Bandon with no fibre to the town I have come to the conclusion that there are certain things a country should own and control itself. All that talk about sovereignty recently and yet we don’t own our telecommunications infrastructure. Who, other than the state, could build a Fibre to the Home infrastructure in Ireland given the investment required and the long period over which it would make a return? NIMA would own and manage:
- ESB Networks
- Eircom’s infrastructure (this would obviously have to be bought back. What sort of cost?)
- All of the MANs. Any future MAN based on need, not political influence.
- Any strategically important fibre
- RTE TV/Radio Network. An Ad-free, foreign-programme-free www.rte.ie probably fits here with the RTEPlayer
- Twitter has made the leap to being a Public Service Utility and should become a mandatory reporting system for all County Councils around the country. It was invaluable for weather and road reporting over the past few weeks. See Irish Weather Online and my TERROR post here
- Some other very technical things I want to see (via the Ireland CIO/CTO) from a post I did a year ago include:
- Mashups and data mining across departments/areas to be promoted
- No new public sector IT projects to be approved without an API even if that is just RSS
- APIs to be freely available for use by the public wherever possible. Only exception is where individual’s privacy may be impacted. Where this is an issue, anonymised aggregated data provided.
- A CIO Solutions Catalogue to be created with examples of successful projects from all areas of the public sector that can be re-used
- Strong ongoing data-mining of e-tenders system to find repetition and redundancy and to guide those putting up RFTs to re-use or customise existing solutions
- An agile approach to all projects. Quick prototypes mandatory
- An avoidance of boil-the-ocean projects and a move towards simple quick wins locally which bubble up nationally
- Metrics for success defined at early stage of all projects and reported on at regular intervals
- Off the shelf Open Source to be preferred for all projects
- Once per quarter IRLCamp where public sector and private sector get together and present interesting projects, ideas and technologies and learn from each other. These lightweight BarCamp style events will have people at every level, not formal Powerpoint from senior people.
- OPW to be made self-funding with a profit-making mandate.
- Is Failte Ireland self-funding? It should be.
- Ditto Coillte.
- Coillte, OPW, Tourism Ireland, Failte Ireland mandated to generate additional €100m p.a. in revenue from castles, buildings, forests, parks, beaches, camp-sites etc etc in conjunction with new tourist/leisure facilities in all of those. Fees only for the facilities.
- Coillte, OPW, Tourism Ireland, Failte Ireland and other tourism quangos mandated to work with private sector to generate new tourism/leisure revenue streams of at least €100m p.a.
- Temporary removal of all fees and travel taxes for those travelling to Ireland by air/sea.
As I said, an unordered collection. But most of it very achievable by a new competent skills-based government in 6 months.
January 3, 2011 at 7:33 pm
I’m all about changes that don’t require referenda, myself. Especially ones which promote a better match between votes cast and the numbers of people who get elected, but also a couple that’d help with one or two of the points above. Like:
a) Redraw the constituency map and make five-seat constituencies the smallest ones possible. There’s no upper limit on constituency size and most of our mis-proportionality comes from 3- and 4-seat constituencies. Let’s have one for Cork City, for example (6 or 7 seats) and one huge one for all of Dublin City. The numbers show that what women do get elected, almost never get elected in smaller seats, so it’ll help there as well. But making constituencies bigger also makes parochial crap harder to do, and removes the two-party lock that exists all down the west coast. There are Labour, SF and Green voters all over the place outside the cities, and their first prefs don’t currently count for shit.
b) Make sitting councillors, TDs, MEPs and Senators ineligible for candidacy to any election. This is a really easy one with a big win. If they want to run, they have to resign first.
c) Make all persons who were candidates in the last Dail election ineligible for Seanad candidacy until the next Dail election, preventing people who lost those elections from subverting the democratic process and getting into the Oireachtas by other means.
We can do any or all of those three things by simple legislation more or less immediately. The redrawing of boundaries doesn’t even need legislation – it can be done by the next Minister for Environment by order.
January 3, 2011 at 7:39 pm
Brilliant stuff John, thanks. I purposely avoided that topic as I don’t feel knowledgeable enough to talk about it. What you describe makes a lot of sense to me. Particularly doing things that don’t require referenda.
January 3, 2011 at 7:40 pm
Oh, and obviously: free the data.
Geodirectory needs to be free at the point of use for everybody, whether for-profit or not. Likewise if we’re getting postcodes we need the shapefile of their boundaries to be released without charge.
Remove all charges for FoI requests.
Publish all the expenses and salaries of all elected officials everywhere, all the way down to individual receipts.
Bar public authorities from releasing FoI material in non-machine-readable or proprietary formats (including PDFs, .doc and the thoroughly-evil encrypted format used for transcriptions).
Publish all planning and licensing applications (you can’t read licensing apps anywhere at the moment), and geocode them. Ireland, uniquely in the civilised world, requires people to pay money to comment on planning applications – that hasn’t worked out at all well, to put it mildly. It’s got to go.
I could go on for months with this list but looking at the new stuff that’s come down that particular pipe in the UK recently is a good start.
January 3, 2011 at 7:42 pm
Now if only I could get all the people leaving comments on Facebook to leave them here
Link for those who are interested: http://www.facebook.com/notes/conor-oneill/where-does-ireland-go-from-here/496880896121?bcode=1JcdE
January 3, 2011 at 7:44 pm
100% agree with all of that. In fact I think it may be the most important project of all!
January 4, 2011 at 1:29 am
Loads to think about there, Conor!
Just one note, that I can’t write on Facebook as I’m not added as your ‘friend’: the ‘broadbandification scheme’ you mention already exists, at least its infrastructure. It is the national grid, that can be use for distribution of “Broadband over power lines (BPL), also known as power-line Internet or powerband” (see Wikipedia http://bit.ly/broadbandification). I believe it has been used abroad, I reckon in Spain at the least. Though it has some drawbacks, it would represent a unique selling point for a new Eircom.
January 4, 2011 at 2:47 am
FB driving me mad. I have that note set to “everyone” but it still insists that people login to view. And you have to be a friend to comment?
As long as BPL can do decent speeds in both directions without silly contention problems, I’d be interested. Our “7 Mbs ADSL broadband” in Bandon drops to dial-up speeds at night due to contention and crappy lines.
January 4, 2011 at 9:28 am
Brilliant stuff Conor. You’ve got my vote!
January 4, 2011 at 10:28 am
Conor,
You make a lot of sense which is what we would not expect from a politician but which is why you might consider becoming one.
John
January 4, 2011 at 10:45 am
Ah they’d chew me up and spit me out!
January 4, 2011 at 4:38 pm
Well said Conor. The first really positive and sensible blueprint for the revolution we must have.
January 6, 2011 at 11:45 am
Sorry, but the point about democracy is that it is *not* skill-based. If one is skilled, as Conor certainly is, and wants to participate in governing a country, it is about getting the consent of the less-skilled to one’s plans.
A great way to fail in that endeavour is to say, in effect, “if only you could all be more like I am”.
January 6, 2011 at 12:07 pm
Not really sure I understand your first point Fergus. You are saying we shouldn’t encourage the electorate to vote for competent people with skills?
Of course you are absolutely right about consent. Not so sure about “less-skilled” tho. I have met very few people in my life who didn’t have unique skills in some area.
Completely lost on your second point. Why would capable people seeking election make such a statement? My suggestion above is that we the electorate need to move from “vote for him/her they’ll get us a bypass” to something more akin to “vote for him/her, they turned around a basketcase company in the past 10 years and I think they could help fix the country as a whole……..which may eventually get us a bypass”.
Of course I don’t know if we’ll ever get away from short-term WIIFM.
January 10, 2011 at 11:50 am
Democracy is not about maximising the number of “competent people with skills” in parliament. (Even if it was, there is a whole separate argument about the relevant competences and skills). It is about putting the cooercive powers of the State into the hands of those personnel are acceptable to the electorate.
That is my first point, expanded.
My second point is that those who desire that the lectorate should use different criteria to selct their representatives must, unless democracy is to be abandoned, use persuasion.
You ask why “capable” people seeking election would talk down to the voters. It’s a good question, but just watch: they’ll be doing it.
However, I was not referring only to those seeking election, but to all those who hold the view that Ireland’s problem is that the voters keep electing the wrong people. (I am also one of those people holding that view, by the way).
Most of the time, the message from “that side of the House” is that “the voters do X, I’d do Y. Y is the right way, because A, B, C. If only the voters would just do the same exercise I did, they’d see their folly”.
Such messages *do* imply – and advocates of it are occasionally explicit – that the average voter is lacking in the skills necessary to pick a T.D..
I wish to explicitly say that the average voter is uniquely “skilled” in that art.
And I agree that the person without special skills is rare indeed.
January 10, 2011 at 11:52 am
Apologies for the typos above
January 10, 2011 at 12:33 pm
Thanks Fergus, it looks like we are on the same page really.
You hit the key to all of this: persuasion. My blather on a blog will persuade no-one, I’m really just preaching to the converted.
Those who can, do. Those who can’t, blog!
I found it interesting that David McWilliams did a “if I were Taoiseach” post but he shows no interest in running. His writing over the past few years has been uniquely persuasive to a huge number of people.
The experience of George Lee is probably a warning to anyone that ideas are not enough, an ability to function effectively in politics is still needed. Hence the route through the trenches for most people I suppose.
Pingback: Irish Election » We need the Seanad, kept but changed
Pingback: WillKnott.ie » Blog Archive » We need the Seanad, kept but changed